Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Freeze v. Larizza et al
as 3:2023cv01377
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Freeze
Defendant:
R.J. Larizza, Homer "Gator&quo DeLoach, III, Homer Deloach III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ninth Amendment Party Association et al v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Ninth Amendment Party Association and Milton Gerard Esquibel
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Clovis Watson, Jr., Scotty Rhoden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
McBride v. Deloach et al
as 2:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Robert McBride
Defendant:
Bobby Deloach, Mary Deloach and Delaoch General Contracting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1502
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Peterson v. Myers et al
as 3:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Brett Peterson
Defendant:
Michelle Myers, H. D. DeLoach, Alexander Milligan Sharp, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
