Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Virden et al v. Crawford County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2023cv02071
Plaintiff:
Rebecka Virden, Samantha Rowlett and Nina Prater
Defendant:
Crawford County, Arkansas, County Judge Chris Keith, Quorum Court Member Robert Kevin Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Rocha et al
as 2:2022cv02181
Plaintiff:
Alana S. Phillips
Defendant:
Dr. Carlos Rocha, Michael Myers, Leon Philpot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Watlington et al
as 4:2018cv00289
Plaintiff:
Harvey Martin
Defendant:
Eugene Watlington, Martin Clifford, Brinton Ramoly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Roach v. Myers Property Rentals
as 3:2013cv03093
Plaintiff:
John Willis Roach
Defendant:
Myers Property Rentals, Harrison, City of, County of Boone, State of Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehead v. Clinton et al
as 4:2011cv04031
Plaintiff:
David Louis Whitehead
Defendant:
William Jefferson Clinton, George W. Bush, Barrack H. Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitchford v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al
as 3:2011cv00064
Plaintiff:
Frederick Lee Pitchford
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Shirley McGee, Margie Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. FedEx Kinkos
as 2:2009cv02087
Plaintiff:
Carl Edward Myers
Defendant:
FedEx Kinkos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Myers v. State of Arkansas
as 2:2009cv02086
Plaintiff:
Carl Edward Myers
Defendant:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Myers v. Enterprise Rent Car
as 2:2009cv02083
Plaintiff:
Carl Edward Myers
Defendant:
Enterprise Rent Car
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
