Cases 1 - 10 of 296
Temple v. Reliance First Capital LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Erica Davis Temple
Defendant:
Reliance First Capital LLC and Dovenmuehle Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yamamoto v. Office of Inspector General et al
as 2:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Toshihiro Yamamoto
Defendant:
Office of Inspector General, Social Security Administration, SSA Disability Determination Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Moman v. Kelso et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kayla Moman
Defendant:
Daniel Ray Kelso, Mark Moon and Elaina Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Phillips v. City of Satsuma et al
as 1:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Phillips
Defendant:
City of Satsuma, Heather Davis, Clint Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
