Cases 1 - 10 of 26
United States of America v. Humphrey-Stavrou Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02448
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Humphrey-Stavrou Associates, Inc., R & S LLC, Stavrou Associates Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
McDowell v. Tate et al
as 1:2022cv01436
Plaintiff:
Randolph McDowell
Defendant:
Gwendolyn S. Tate and Shavette Conigland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
McDowell v. Tate
as 1:2022cv01435
Plaintiff:
Randolph McDowell
Defendant:
Gwendolyn S. Tate
Consolidated Defendant:
Shavette Conigland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MediGrow LLC v. Natalie M LaPrade Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission et al
as 1:2020cv00504
Defendant:
M.D. Elizabeth Q Hines, M.D. C Obi Onyewu, Saundra O Washington and others
Plaintiff:
MediGrow LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00349
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 a
McDowell v. The City of Baltimore et al
as 1:2019cv01611
Defendant:
Brain Murphy, David Young, Ivan Bates and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv
Oates et al v. Dollar Tree Corporate Headquaters et al
as 1:2019cv01420
Defendant:
Andre Davis, Terrance Sheridanin, Woodland Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph Wayne Oates and Emanuel David Joshua Oates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
