Cases 1 - 10 of 37
JOHNSON v. WATERVILLE HEALTH & WELFARE
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Defendant:
WATERVILLE HEALTH & WELFARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. REID
as 2:2024cv00301
Defendant:
JASON REID
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Defendant:
DONALD J TRUMP, FACEBOOK, META and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BARTH v. WATERBORO et al
as 2:2023cv00295
Defendant:
MARILYN MILLER, TOWN OF WATERBORO, GARY LAMB and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN S BARTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWDY v. CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
SHAWN W BROWDY
Defendant:
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY, DAVID CARON and MITCHELL TANNENBAUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POOLE v. HANCOCK COUNTY et al
as 1:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY POOLE
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY, SCOTT KANE, TIMOTHY RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KNOWLES v. PONTE et al
as 2:2021cv00108
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE KNOWLES
Defendant:
HEATHER E CHARRON, GUY W TINKHAM, EDWARD O'CONNOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYAN C et al v. LAMBREW et al
as 1:2021cv00005
Plaintiff:
GRAYSON M, KENDALL P, TRENT W and others
Defendant:
TODD A LANDRY and JEANNE M LAMBREW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARNEY et al v. HANCOCK COUNTY MAINE et al
as 1:2020cv00349
Defendant:
FRANK L SHEP ARD, AROOSTOOK MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC, KAYLA DUMOND and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERTA E WINCHELL, ESQ and STEW ART CARNEY, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAGRE v. IRELAND et al
as 1:2019cv00083
Defendant:
MARK BROWN, SCOTT W IRELAND and JEFFREY PARKS
Plaintiff:
JESSICA L FAGRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
