Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BARBER v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2024cv03202
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS BARBER and ESTATE OF EVELYN SETTEMBRE
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE NEW JERSEY VETERANS MEMORIAL HOME AT MENLO PARK, THE NJ VETERANS MEMORIAL HOME AT PARAMUS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
REDO v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2023cv21424
Plaintiff:
PAMELA NEIPER REDO
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE NEW JERSEY VETERANS MEMORIAL HOME AT MENLO PARK, THE NJ VETERANS MEMORIAL HOME AT PARAMUS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HAMPTON v. LITTLE CAESARS ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01582
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HAMPTON
Defendant:
LITTLE CAESARS ENTERPRISES, INC., PHOENIX NEXUS, YAEDON LC LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
BATISTA v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOY et al
as 2:2015cv02833
Plaintiff:
SUSAN BATISTA
Defendant:
CITY OF PERTH AMBOY , CITY OF PERTH AMBOY POLICE DEPARTMENT , WILDA DIAZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. Layton et al
as 3:2014cv02951
Plaintiff:
Anton Ewing
Defendant:
Farrell K. Layton , Tracy Dishno , Stacee Botsford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv06872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ADEGBITE et al v. MURDOCH et al
as 2:2012cv00520
Plaintiff:
VANESSA ADEGBITE and MONA BARKER
Defendant:
RUPERT MURDOCH, NEW YORK POST, NEWS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADEGBITE v. MURDOCH et al
as 2:2011cv00492
Plaintiff:
VANESSA ADEGBITE
Defendant:
RUPERT MURDOCH, NEW YORK POST, NEWS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Edwin et al v. Simpson et al
as 2:2008cv01330
Plaintiff:
Ron Edwin and Kathy Edwin
Defendant:
Elizabeth Simpson, State of Arizona, John Doe Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
