Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bergeron, et al v. Cabral
as 10-1012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY TURLEY, DAVID BERGERON, JOHN BARNES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREA CABRAL, individually and as Sheriff of Suffolk County
Azubuko et al v. Skerritt et al
as 3:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko, Chisom O. Azubuko and Precious Okereke
Defendant:
Rachel Skerritt, Carol Johnson, Paul Iantosca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Azubuko et al v. Skerritt et al
as 3:2009mc00394
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko, Chisom O. Azubuko and Precious Okereke
Defendant:
Rachel Skerritt, Carol Johnson, Paul Iantosca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nwachuku, et al v. Walsh, et al
as 09-1982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER C. NWACHUKU and JOEATTA K. SMITH-NWACHUKU
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL WALSH, JOHN KELLY, SEAN JOYCE and others
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH COUNTY, EDDY CHRISPIN, JOHN M. BUCKLEY and others
Bergeron, et al v. Cabral
as 08-1683
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID BERGERON, JOHN GRENNON, LORNE F. LYNCH and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDREA CABRAL, individually and as Sheriff of Suffolk County
Osayyah v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv12300
Plaintiff:
Constantine Osayyah
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Peter D Keisler, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Matthews v. Cabral et al
as 1:2007cv12218
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Matthews
Defendant:
Andrea Cabral and Gerard Horgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv11254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
