Cases 1 - 10 of 13,870
Allen v. County of Contra Costa et al
as 4:2024cv03759
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa and John Krieg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castello v. Arbogast et al
as 4:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Castello
Defendant:
Tyler Arbogast, Jennifer Bowers, Jacob Horan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Francois et al v. Hutson et al
as 2:2024cv01608
Plaintiff:
Dana Francois and Terry Brandon Francois
Defendant:
Susan Hutson, Wellpath, LLC, Kent Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Death)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Anthony E. West v. Calandra Williams et al
as 2:2024cv05199
Plaintiff:
Anthony E West
Defendant:
Calandra Williams, Alfredo Zendejas, Thomas R. Slattery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Daytona Beach Ventures LLC
as 6:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lewis
Defendant:
Daytona Beach Ventures LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Aquino v. MP 21 Soledad St LP
as 24-1973
Plaintiff:
PAUL ANTHONY AQUINO
Defendant:
MP 21 SOLEDAD ST LP, MIDPEN HOUSING and MOONGATE PLAZA
Aquino v. Department of Head City of Salinas
as 24-1972
Plaintiff:
PAUL ANTHONY AQUINO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HEAD CITY OF SALINAS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hancock, Dylan v. Barron County, Wisconsin et al
as 3:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Dylan Hancock
Defendant:
Barron County, Wisconsin, Sheriff Chris Fitzgerald, Deputy Eric Sedani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
