Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ash, Davenell v. Superior Police Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Superior Police Dept., Judge Kelly Thimm, Prosecutor Chad Lalor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash, Davenell v. Thimm, Kelly et al
as 3:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Kelly Thimm, Chad LaLor, Officer Todd Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ash, Davenell v. Superior Police Dept. et al
as 3:2022cv00512
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Superior Police Dept., Mr. Kelly Hashey and Mrs. Kelly Hashey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash, Davenell v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2021cv00317
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Faust et al v. Vilsack et al
as 1:2021cv00548
Plaintiff:
Adam P Faust, Jon Stevens, Joseph W Schmitz and others
Defendant:
Thomas J Vilsack, Zack Duchaneaux and Zach Ducheneaux
Amicus Curiae:
Community Farm Alliance, Rural Coalition, Kansas Black Farmers Association and others
Petitioner:
Lee Perry and Corey Lea
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Kreger-Mueller, Valerie v. Withee, Daniel et al
as 3:2019cv00741
Defendant:
Ryan Roettger, Michael Ash, Tyler Loether and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie Kreger-Mueller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ash et al v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
Margaret Ash , Randy Hanson , Ronald Musselman and others
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Ash v. Bias et al
as 2:2014cv00553
Plaintiff:
Lavon J Ash, Sr
Defendant:
Jennifer Bias, Addrienne Moore, Ahmed Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ash v. State Public Defenders Office et al
as 2:2014cv00327
Defendant:
State Public Defenders Office, Racine County State District Attorneys Office, Racine County and others
Plaintiff:
Lavon J Ash, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
