Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Arroyo, et al v. Myers, et al
as 23-1137
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSE ARROYO, HEATHER BOEHM, SAMUEL CORDO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEREK MYERS
Defendant:
ALEXANDER HALL, TIMOTHY HOLCOMB, JOSHUA MOORE and others
Arroyo, et al v. Privett
as 22-1307
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSE ARROYO, HEATHER BOEHM, SAMUEL CORDO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW PRIVETT
Defendant:
ALEXANDER HALL, JOSHUA MOORE, TIMOTHY HOLCOMB and others
Arroyo, et al v. Holcomb, et al
as 22-1310
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSE ARROYO, HEATHER BOEHM, SAMUEL CORDO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY HOLCOMB, DUSTIN ROSS and CHAD WEISE
Defendant:
ALEXANDER HALL, JOSHUA MOORE, ANDREW PRIVETT and others
Arroyo, et al v. Hall, et al
as 22-1309
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSE ARROYO, HEATHER BOEHM, SAMUEL CORDO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXANDER HALL and JOSHUA MOORE
Defendant:
ANDREW PRIVETT, TIMOTHY HOLCOMB, DUSTIN ROSS and others
May et al v. M.R. Associates, L.P.
as 1:2022cv00986
Plaintiff:
Caroline May, Benjamin Matthew-Blake Hall, Caroline Hall and others
Defendant:
M.R. Associates, L.P. and Stacy West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Arroyo et al v. Eischen et al
as 1:2021cv01687
Defendant:
Christopher Fernandez, Derek Myers, Holcomb Timothy and others
Plaintiff:
Amber Miller, Jose Arroyo, Samuel Cordo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hall et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv02393
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER ROMAN, UNNAMED CITY OF CHICAGO POLICE OFFICERS, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Plaintiff:
Patsy Pierce and Alexander Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricardo Hall v. Gary Cool
as 12-15500
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICARDO ALEXANDER HALL
Defendant - Appellant:
GARY COOL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
