Cases 1 - 10 of 21
KM SPIRITUAL COLLECTIVE CONFEDERATION et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv00879
Plaintiff:
MICHIGAN MOTHER MEDICINE CHURCH OF KM, TIMOTHY LOCKARD, AARON GIBBS and others
Defendant:
SEAN REYES, STATE OF OREGON, UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv25254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Hendricks et al
as 1:2016cv24746
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony King
Defendant:
Patricia E. Hendricks and Evan Hendricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony King v. H. Nguyen, et al
as 15-13286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY KING
Defendant - Appellee:
H. NGUYEN, T. R. WILLIAMS, C. T. BAXTER and others
King v. Nguyen et al
as 1:2013cv02816
Plaintiff:
Anthony King
Defendant:
H. Nguyen, K. Home, T. R. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv02982
Plaintiff:
Anthony King
Defendant:
Police Officer Michael Miezianka, The City of New York and The New York City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shawn Brown v. Unknown Officers of PG County
as 13-1199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN OFFICERS OF THE PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER ZACHARY O'LARE, OFFICER ANTHONY KING and others
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MD, ROBBIE LOVEDAY, CPL DARIN BUSH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv09032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
King v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02344
Defendant:
"John Doe" and "Jane Doe" and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Anthony King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blumenthal v. Combs et al
as 5:2012cv11859
Plaintiff:
Thomas Henry Blumenthal, III
Defendant:
Thomas Combs, Sonia Amos-Warchock, Amy Bonito and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
