Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ricky Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Colgate Palmolive Co, et al
as 23-2982
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
Defendant / Appellee:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO, HILLS PET NUTRITION, NATURASOURCE INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
Defendant:
MS. KIM, DEBRA NICHOLS, DAVE BALOGA and others
KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD v. COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv06623
Plaintiff:
RICKY E. KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
Defendant:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY, HILL'S PET NUTRITION INC, NATURASOURCE INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jessica B Martinez v. Andrea Cecilia Riser et al
as 2:2022cv05146
Plaintiff:
Jessica B Martinez
Defendant:
Andrea Cecilia Riser and Harbor Property Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132
Flores v. Exclusa et al
as 1:2016cv04264
Plaintiff:
Edward Flores
Defendant:
S. Exclusa, K. Pfeifer, B. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
FILING ERROR
as 7:2015cv00236
Plaintiff:
James W. Close
Defendant:
Moises B. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Close v. Martinez
as 7:2015cv00237
Plaintiff:
James W. Close
Defendant:
Moises B. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Smith v. Apodaca et al
as 1:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
Steven Craig Smith
Defendant:
Ernest A Apodaca, D. Brokaw, B. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banibaker et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv05439
Plaintiff:
Thaer Banibaker and Jake Russel
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, D Enriquez, Jr. and B Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
