Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Booth v. Miller et al
as 4:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Booth
Defendant:
Brantley Miller and Michael Ganatos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Town of Prosper, Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Leonard Johnson
Defendant:
Town of Prosper, Texas, Paul Boothe and Doug Kowalski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Contreras v. Wilson et al
as 4:2022cv04130
Plaintiff:
Adam Contreras
Defendant:
Melissa Wilson, David Wilson, Wanda Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Contreras v. Wilson et al
as 4:2022cv04028
Plaintiff:
Adam Contreras
Defendant:
David Wilson, Melissa Wilson, Wanda Wilson & Her Husband and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Contreras v. Wilson et al
as 4:2022cv04029
Plaintiff:
Adam Contreras
Defendant:
David Wilson, Melissa Wilson, Wanda Wilson, Her Husband Zachary Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Omoloh v. Catherine Booth Friendship House
as 4:2021cv00575
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Omoloh
Defendant:
Catherine Booth Friendship House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv03114
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCasland v. Upshur County, Texas et al
as 2:2018cv00401
Defendant:
Alan Wade, Kacey Deluca, Lakisha Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Everette McCasland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Galveston County et al
as 3:2018cv00104
Plaintiff:
Aaron Booth and Cody Tucker
Defendant:
Galveston County , Kerry Neves, Lonnie Cox and others
Amicu:
The Office of the Attorney General - Amicus Curiae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Booth v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2015cv02435
Plaintiff:
Allison Anne Booth
Defendant:
City of Dallas and John/Jane Does Nos. 1-4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
