Cases 1 - 10 of 23
PIERSON v. BALDWIN et al
as 2:2022cv00497
Plaintiff:
BYRON PIERSON
Defendant:
JEFFERY BALDWIN, M KENDRA KLUMP, JAMES P. HANLON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
JOHNSON v. NAJJAR et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Plaintiff:
QUANTAE A JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID K. NAJJAR, TODD RUETZ, MICHELLE MCCUEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALDWIN v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2019cv02344
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY BALDWIN
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (IDOC), WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02869
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01937
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Payne et al v. Royal et al
as 1:2018cv00123
Plaintiff:
Alicia Nailia Royal
Defendant:
Myikell Payne, Daniel Baldwin, Selma Cakor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALDWIN et al v. GREENFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00246
Plaintiff:
TRICIA BALDWIN
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENFIELD, INDIANA, GREENFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nino v. Dean Baldwin Painting
as 3:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Luis Nino
Defendant:
Dean Baldwin Painting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALDWIN v. WITTLE et al
as 1:2017cv00823
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L BALDWIN
Defendant:
BLUE LINE LP INC, MENARD, INC., BENJAMIN POLLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
