Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Baker v. The City of Jackson et al
as 5:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Dylon Baker
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Officer Jeff Watts, Officer Brant Noble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jorge v. Custer et al
as 3:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Paulo Jorge
Defendant:
Michael Custer, Timothy Begley and Town of Rocky Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris et al v. Wayne et al
as 2:2023cv10986
Plaintiff:
Nicole Harris, Blanca Arguelles, Amber Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Officer Terri Graham and Terri Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Toshalyn Murray v. Tom Pyle, et al
as 23-3016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOSHALYN MURRAY
Defendant:
TOM PYLE
Defendant / Appellee:
ATHENS COUNTY, OH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ATHENS COUNTY, OH CHILDREN SERVICES, ATHENS CITY, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
England v. Perkins et al
as 1:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Deputy Ronnie Golden, Trooper Jacob Harper, Trooper Zachary Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Rebecca England
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lemay v. Begley et al
as 1:2019cv04544
Defendant:
Mark Magill, Elizabeth Rogers, Candace Begley and others
Plaintiff:
Tamara Lemay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00337
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Aaron et al v. The Ohio Medical Board et al
as 1:2018cv00882
Plaintiff:
Roger Johnson, Richard Elliott, Adrian Lilly and others
Defendant:
Anita M. Steinbergh, DO, Richard Whitehouse, The Ohio Medical Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacob Mandel, et al v. CSU Board of Trustees, et al
as 18-17277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB MANDEL, CHARLES VOLK, LIAM KERN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY, MARY ANN BEGLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
