Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Alfonso v. City of Pendleton et al
as 2:2023cv00862
Plaintiff:
Anson Alfonso
Defendant:
City of Pendleton, Nathan Bessette and Christopher Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gillum v. City of Pendleton et al
as 2:2022cv01029
Plaintiff:
Matthew G. Gillum
Defendant:
City of Pendleton, Pendleton Police Department, Officer Chase T. Addleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FOLCHERT v. FORD et al
as 5:2020cv00112
Defendant:
BILLY PACHER, AMBER THARP, JOHN DOE 1-3 and others
Plaintiff:
KADE FOLCHERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Erdmann, David v. Domtar et al
as 3:2014cv00011
Plaintiff:
David H. Erdmann
Defendant:
Domtar, Jeff Siteala, Chris Bodette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURTIS et al v. BROWN et al
as 1:2013cv00280
Plaintiff:
CASSIE L CURTIS and MATHIAS C POULIN
Defendant:
JON F BROWN , ROBERT WILLIAMS , RAYMOND A BESSETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bessette v. Bove
as 2:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
Eric Bessette
Defendant:
Richard Bove, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pepper Draper et al v State of Arizona et al
as 8:2012cv01602
Plaintiff:
Grant Abbot, William O Abright, Justin Ahrens and others
Defendant:
State of Indiana, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Shawn DesAutel, et al v. Anita Dupris, et al
as 11-35926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN LAWRENCE DESAUTEL, TAMARA DESAUTEL DAVIS and TONIA RENE DESAUTEL
Defendant - Appellee:
ANITA B. DUPRIS, DENNIS L. NELSON, DAVID C. BONGA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
