Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Bishop v. CPO Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee Bishop
Defendant:
CPO Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Howard v. Andover Public Schools, et al
as 24-1268
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. HOWARD, individually and as next friend of P.H. and B.H.
Defendant:
ANDOVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS, MAGDA PARVEY, Superintendent of Schools, CAITLIN BROWN, Principal, Andover High School and others
Lee v. City University N.Y.
as 1:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee
Defendant:
City University N.Y.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Brooklyn Hospital
as 1:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee
Defendant:
Brooklyn Hospital, Dr., Female Spanish Clerk Receptionist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Brooklyn Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee
Defendant:
Brooklyn Hospital and Dr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. City University N.Y.
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee
Defendant:
City University N.Y.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. HUD (Housing Urban Development)
as 1:2023cv11239
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee
Defendant:
HUD (Housing Urban Development)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Andover Public Schools et al
as 1:2023cv12177
Plaintiff:
David Howard
Defendant:
Andover Public Schools, Magda Parvey, Caitlin Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Held v. State of Montana et al
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee Held and Brenda-Lee Held
Defendant:
State of Montana, Greg Gianforte, Austin Knudsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dennis Vidal v. State of Wisconsin, et al
as 22-3088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS VIDAL
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, JANE DOES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
