Civil Rights Cases
McAllister v. Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC
as 2:2023cv10581
Plaintiff: Dana McAllister
Defendant: Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Breonnah Fitzpatrick, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 22-55884
Plaintiff / Appellee: BREONNAH FITZPATRICK, an individual and as class representative, CHRISTOPHER OFFICER and TIMOTHY MCCARTY
Defendant / Appellant: CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation, SELETA REYNOLDS, General Manager, an individual and BRIAN HALE, Chief - Parking Enforcement and Traffic Control, individually and in their official capacities
Defendant: CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTION, a public entity, HANKS WILSHIRE TOW, INC., a California corporation, BRIDGECREST ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION and others
Breonnah Fitzpatrick v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv06841
Plaintiff: Breonnah Fitzpatrick, Christopher Officer and Timothy McCarty
Cross Defendant: City of Los Angeles
Defendant: City of Los Angeles Department of Transportion, Seleta Reynolds, Brian Alan Hale and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: James E Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Marshall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00294
Defendant: Kim Ballard, Raymond C. Fidel, National Drivetime Used Automobile Sales and others
Plaintiff: Edward James Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02095
Plaintiff: Lee Cunningham
Defendant: Twenty 4 Seven Recovery, Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc., Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Bridgecrest et al
as 1:2018cv02231
Defendant: Mark G. Sauder, Raymond C. Fadel, Jon D. Ehlinger and others
Plaintiff: Linda Marie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?