Cases 1 - 10 of 15
DeRaffele et al v. Unified Court System of New York et al
as 7:2024cv01920
Plaintiff:
Christopher DeRaffele, John DeRaffele, C.D. a minor and others
Defendant:
Unified Court System of New York, Family Court of New Rochelle, Honorable Judge Melissa Loehr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
April Malick, et al v. Croswell-Lexington District Schools, et al
as 24-1147
Plaintiff:
APRIL MALICK, Individually and as Next Friend of C.M., a minor, ROB MALICK, Individually and as Next Friend of C.M., a minor and C. M., a Minor by Next Friends Rob and April Malick
Defendant:
CROSWELL-LEXINGTON DISTRICT SCHOOLS, CROSWELL-LEXINGTON BOARD OF EDUCATION, DAN GILBERTSON, in his individual and official capacity and others
Eileen Chollet v. Scott Brabrand
as 24-1059
Plaintiff:
DENNIS MA, on behalf of C.M., a minor, MERYEM GHAZAL, on behalf of P.G., a minor, RICHARD GHAZAL, on behalf of P.G., a minor and others
Defendant:
DR. SCOTT BRABRAND, in his role as Superintendent, Fairfax County Public Schools
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
V.B. et al v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2022cv08571
Plaintiff:
V.B. and V.B. on behalf of her child C.M., a minor,
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Malick et al v. Croswell-Lexington District Schools et al
as 2:2022cv11126
Plaintiff:
April Malick, Individually and as Next Friend for C.M., a minor child, Rob Malick, Individually and as Next Friend for C.M., a minor child, April Malick and others
Defendant:
Croswell-Lexington District Schools, Croswell-Lexington Board of Education, Dan Gilbertson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Eileen Chollet v. Scott Brabrand
as 22-1005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS MA, on behalf of C.M., a minor, MERYEM GHAZAL, on behalf of P.G., a minor, RICHARD GHAZAL, on behalf of P.G., a minor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. SCOTT BRABRAND, in his role as Superintendent, Fairfax County Public Schools
Shirlenna McKenzie v. Talladega City Board of Educ., et al
as 17-11514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHIRLENNA MCKENZIE, as next friend of C.M., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
TALLADEGA CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, JENNIFER JACKSON, in her individual capacity and JEWELL MONROE
:
SERVICE
Loushonda Myers v. Steve Bizzell
as 16-1083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUSHONDA MYERS, In Propria Persona Plaintiff, Private Attorney General, on behalf of Dameon Myers and Tyre Myers, In Propria Persona Plaintiffs
Plaintiff:
C.M., a minor child, A.M., a minor child, M.M., a minor child and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF STEVE BIZZELL, individually and in his official capacity as an employee with the Johnston County Sheriff's Office, CAPTAIN A.C. FISH, individually and in his official capacity as an employee with the Johnston County Sheriff's Office, DETECTIVE C.K. ALLEN, individually and in his official capacity as an employee with the Johnston County Sheriff's Office and others
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, KRISTA L. BENNET, individually and in her official capacity as Facilitator with the North Carolina State Bar, FERN GUNN SIMEON, individually and in her official capacity as Deputy Counsel with the North Carolina State Bar and others
Loushonda Myers v. The State of North Carolina
as 13-2057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUSHONDA MYERS, C.M., a minor child, A.M., a minor child and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, KRISTA L. BENNET, individually and in her official capacity as Facilitator with the North Carolina State Bar, FERN GUNN SIMEON, individually and in her official capacity as Deputy Counsel with the North Carolina State Bar and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
