Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Carrillo v. Comenity Capital Bank et al
as 2:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Comenity Capital Bank, Caesar's Casino, Harrah's Ak-Chin Casino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cornerstone Capital Bank, SSB vs. Manuel Valdes
as 4:2023cv03685
Cross Defendant:
Cornerstone Capital Bank, SSB
Counter Plaintiff:
Manuel Valdes
3Rd Party Defendant:
Marc Laird and Adam Laird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
RKCJ LLC v. Texas Capital Bank NA
as 3:2020cv00533
Defendant:
Texas Capital Bank NA
Plaintiff:
RKCJ LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00896
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Woodruff et al v. Mason McDuffie Mortgage Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv01054
Plaintiff:
Kevin Paul Woodruff, Chief Wanag Tahatan, Estate of Tanya Stutson and others
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., US Bank, NA, Cenlar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00878
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. Child Protective Services, et al.
as 2:2016cv03049
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jerome Lewis
Defendant:
Child Protective Services, Sacramento County Superior Court, Sacramento District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
