Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Burke v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 22-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE D. BURKE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA, a Municipal Corporation, G.T. BYNUM, Mayor of City of Tulsa, MARK SWINNEY, City of Tulsa Attorney and others
Burke v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Michele D Burke
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, G T Bynum, Mark Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 2:2020cv02071
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration and DEA Agents
Plaintiff:
Cantral James Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Military Entrance Processing Station et al
as 2:2018cv02723
Defendant:
US Marines and Military Entrance Processing Station
Plaintiff:
Cantral James Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karim Christian Kamal v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv01986
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Rebecca Lynch, County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works and others
Plaintiff:
Karim Christian Kamal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2016cv02716
Plaintiff:
Cantral James Anderson
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Internal Revenue Service Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shannon Kanda v. Wayne Longo, et al
as 10-35746
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANNON KANDA
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE LONGO, CITY OF COEUR D'ALENE, COEUR D'ALENE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Anderson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 2:2010cv02139
Plaintiff:
Cantral James Anderson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Miscellaneou:
Otis Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
