Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv80866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Matthew Kezhaya v. City of Belle Plaine
as 22-2183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
The Satanic Temple
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Belle Plaine, Minnesota
Petitioner / Appellant:
Matthew A. Kezhaya
Pablo Enrique Elias et al v. City of Bell Gardens et al
as 2:2021cv05576
Plaintiff:
Pablo Enrique Elias and Consuelo Rodriguez
Defendant:
City of Bell Gardens, DOES 1 through 10 and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Satanic Temple, Inc., The v. City of Belle Plaine, MN
as 0:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
Satanic Temple, The and Satanic Temple, Inc., The
Defendant:
Belle Plaine, City of and City of Belle Plaine, MN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwin Cruz v. City of Bell Gardens et al
as 2:2020cv01263
Defendant:
DOES 1 to 20, Officer Kramer, City of Bell Gardens and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Cruz
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard T. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trammel et al v. Suydam et al
as 4:2020cv00029
Plaintiff:
Claudia Trammel and Tommie Trammel
Defendant:
Shawn Suydam and City of Belle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv62941
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv81612
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
