Cases 1 - 10 of 25
WARREN v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02047
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, GREG HOLCUMB, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Teddy Driver v. Ty Solomon, et al
as 22-2151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEDDY H. DRIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
TY SOLOMON, Kokomo Police Officer #372, TRAVIS WILLIAMS, Kokomo Police Officer #387, CODY RAYLS, Kokomo Police Officer, a.k.a. OFFICER CODY RAYLES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SPENCE v. CITY OF KOKOMO et al
as 1:2021cv03012
Plaintiff:
ROBIN SPENCE
Defendant:
CITY OF KOKOMO, MCCLANE, GRAM DENNIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS et al v. MILLER et al
as 1:2021cv02505
Plaintiff:
BRANDON ADAMS
Defendant:
MARK MILLER, GREG SHELINE, TYLER O. MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CITY OF KOKOMO, INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv02035
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA PHILLIP SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF KOKOMO, INDIANA, DOUGLAS STOUT, CARY JACOBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERGUSON v. CITY OF KOKOMO et al
as 1:2020cv02539
Defendant:
CITY OF KOKOMO, USPS and KOKOMO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
KENNETH S. FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KIMBROUGH v. CITY OF KOKOMO TRASH REMOVAL et al
as 1:2020cv01186
Defendant:
Alex Harper, Officer John Doe, City of Kokomo Trash Removal and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. KIMBROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
