Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Gentry, Sr. et al v. City of Hayward et al
as 4:2024cv02593
Plaintiff:
Terry Ray Gentry, Sr., Terry Christopher Ray Gentry, Jr. and P. G.
Defendant:
City of Hayward and George Correia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antar v. Grogins et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Auden Grogins, Scott Jones, Jane Grossman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pickard v. The City of Sanford et al
as 6:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
William Glenn Pickard
Defendant:
The City of Sanford, The State of Florida, Phil Archer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CORREIA et al v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
ZELIA CORREIA
Defendant:
ROBERT HUTCHINSON and BAYVIEW APARTMENTS LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CORREIA v. HUTCHINSON et al
as 1:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
ZELIA CORREIA
Defendant:
ROBERT HUTCHINSON and BAYVIEW APARTMENTS LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Fandal v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv06175
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fandal
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Police Department, P.O. Nicholas Toscano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pickard v. Archer et al
as 6:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
William Glenn Pickard
Defendant:
Phil Archer, Daniel Hernandez, Grant Malloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Pickard et al
as 6:2023cv00395
Defendant:
William Glenn Pickard, City of Sanford, Philip Glen Archer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
