Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Laing v. Smith et al
as 6:2024cv06545
Defendant:
County of Monroe, David M. Smith, Hon. Judge Vincent Dinolfo and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Laing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Marianne Sawicki v. Michael Kipphan, et al
as 24-2120
Defendant:
ANGELA J. ROBINSON, MICHAEL M. KIPPHAN, BOROUGH OF HUNTINGDON and others
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE SAWICKI
Shepherd v. Smith et al
as 6:2024cv06487
Defendant:
Rochester Police Department, Jacob M. Carter, David E. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Elijah John Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marianne Sawicki v. Michael Kipphan, et al
as 24-2033
Defendant:
DAVID G. SMITH, COUNTY OF HUNTINGDON, PENNSYLVANIA, CHRISTOPHER B. WENCKER and others
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE SAWICKI
Smith v. Catamount Properties 2018, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
David Ronald Smith
Defendant:
Catamount Properties 2018, LLC, Rubin Lublin, LLC, Kimberly A. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv04808
Plaintiff:
Arthur Edward Smith
Defendant:
David J. Smith and Peter F. Busscher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Petrosyan v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01191
Plaintiff:
Gurgen Petrosyan
Defendant:
David J. Smith, William H. Pryor, Jr. and Marcia Morales Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. SMITH
as 1:2023cv01532
Plaintiff:
SILVIA JOYCE JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID D. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. DAVID D. SMITH PLLC
as 1:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
SILVIA JOYCE JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID D. SMITH PLLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HEPHZIBAH v. PHILLIPS et al
as 4:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
SYTERIA HEPHZIBAH
Defendant:
JOHN PHILLIPS, ELIZABETH WARREN, TRACI E ABRAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
