Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Joseph Delarosa v. Village of Romeoville, et al
as 24-1715
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DELAROSA
Defendant:
VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE, BRANT HROMADKA and MIKE RYAN
Delarosa v. Village of Romeoville et al
as 1:2023cv07049
Plaintiff:
Joseph Delarosa
Defendant:
Village of Romeoville, Brant Hromadka and Mike Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv01381
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Williams
Defendant:
City of New York, NYPD Officer Omar Delarosa, NYPD Officer Steven Carabello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chaney v. Cook et al
as 1:2022cv00839
Plaintiff:
Nakia Chaney
Defendant:
Keith Cook, Adirondack Insurance Exchange Company, Progressive Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATTHEWS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv01124
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MATTHEWS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MILTON DELAROSA, MARK MULLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Delarosa v. Mensah et al
as 2:2021cv01179
Defendant:
Joseph Anthony Mensah, City of Wauwatosa and Barry Weber
Executor:
Starkeisha Delarosa
Not Classified By Court:
Jay Anderson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
