Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Jamaal Bilal v. Jeffrey Benoit, et al
as 23-11703
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAAL ALI BILAL
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY BENOIT, JOHN HODGES, TED SHAW and others
BILAL v. BENOIT et al
as 3:2023cv04754
Plaintiff:
JAMAAL ALI BILAL, JOHN L. BURTON and SUPERMAN
Defendant:
JEFFREY BENOIT, JOHN HODGES, TED SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena Bejerano v. GEO Care, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv22361
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Geo Care, LLC, Shevaun Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Pena Bejerano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pena Bejerano v. GEO Care, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00256
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, GEO Care, LLC, Shevaun Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Pena Bejerano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YASIR v. POPPELL et al
as 4:2020cv00050
Defendant:
DONALD SAWYER and CHAD POPPELL
Plaintiff:
SABIR ABDUL HAQQ YASIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boatman v. Riddle
as 2:2018cv00750
Defendant:
Dorothy Riddle, Donald Sawyer, Rebecca Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Donald Sawyer et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2015cv02464
Defendant:
Atkinson, Boyd, County of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Sawyer and Mary Sawyer
Roland III v. McMayle et al
as 1:2012cv06331
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Roland III
Defendant:
McMayle, Taft, Saul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balkum v. Sawyer
as 11-5339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jason Balkum, and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald Sawyer, being sued in their official and individual capacities, Sharen Barbosa, being sued in their official and individual capacities and Nikhili Nihalani, being sued in their official and individual capacities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
