Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Watkins v. Property Management Service Incorporated et al
as 5:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
Donald Watkins
Defendant:
Property Management Service Incorporated, Matthew Wensauer and Kristen Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Watkins v. Walmart Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00461
Plaintiff:
Donald Watkins
Defendant:
Mike Speck, Walmart Incorporated, Kelvin Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bellant et al v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2017cv13887
Plaintiff:
Russ Bellant , Tawanna Simpson , Lamar Lemmons and others
Defendant:
RICHARD D. SNYDER, Andrew Dillon, R. Kevin Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00060
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BOB JACKSON, NANA WRIGHT-PADILLA and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD WATKINS , SR and DONALD WATKINS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Texas v. Watkins
as 3:2016cv01547
Defendant:
Donald Watkins
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Watkins v. Pitre
as 3:2016cv01306
Plaintiff:
Donald Watkins
Defendant:
Felicia Pitre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Greyhound Lines Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv01265
Plaintiff:
Donald Watkins
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Incorporated, Nikki and Alonzo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Catherine Phillips, et al v. Richard Snyder, et al
as 15-2394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CATHERINE PHILLIPS, JOSEPH VALENTI, MICHIGAN AFSCME COUNCIL 25 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD D SNYDER and ANDREW DILLON
Phillips et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2013cv11370
Plaintiff:
Catherine Phillips , Joseph Valenti , Michigan AFSCME Council 25 and others
Defendant:
RICHARD D SNYDER and Andrew Dillon
WATKINS v. PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv06281
Plaintiff:
DONALD WATKINS, JR.
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY, BELIND, CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE and VENITA, SUPERVISOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
