Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Blandin v. Smith, et al
as 23-2175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARROD BLANDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN SMITH, in his individual capacity as New Mexico State Police Officer, NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, DANIEL CHAVEZ, in his individual capacity and others
Chavez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv07754
Plaintiff:
Daniel Chavez
Defendant:
City of New York, Eric Adams and David Chokshi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Med Care Emergency v. Flores
as 23-40340
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Med Care Emergency Medical Services, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellant:
Itza Flores, Ambrosio "Amos" Hernandez, Ricardo Medina and others
Blandin v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Blandin
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, New Mexico Department of Public Safety, Marc Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Med Care Emergency Medical Services, Inc. v. City of Pharr, Texas et al
as 7:2021cv00445
Plaintiff:
MED CARE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
City of Pharr, Texas, Itza Flores, Ambrosio "Amos" Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04045
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brian Walker v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2013cv00279
Defendant:
Charlie Beck, Charlie Beck, Daniel Chavez and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Walker
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
