Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv08727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Sutherland v. Joseph J. Lumpkin Sr. et al
as 4:2015cv00275
Plaintiff:
David Sutherland
Defendant:
City of Savannah Georgia Savannah-Chatham County Police Department, Joseph J. Lumpkin, Daniel Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shammah v. The State of New Jersey et al
as 3:2015cv06727
Plaintiff:
Albert A. Shammah
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Dan Kobil, Ronan Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Shammah v. The State of New Jersey et al
as 1:2015cv06713
Plaintiff:
Albert A. Shammah
Defendant:
The State of New Jersey, Dan Kobil, Ronan Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sutherland v. Savannah-Chatham Police Department et al
as 4:2015cv00188
Plaintiff:
David Sutherland
Defendant:
Savannah-Chatham Police Department, Joseph J. Lumpkin, Sr, Daniel Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Newman v. Hamburg Township, et al
as 14-1455
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL NEWMAN
Defendant:
HAMBURG TOWNSHIP and PATRICK DEBOTTTIS
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC CALHOUN
Newman v. Morse et al
as 2:2013cv10193
Plaintiff:
Daniel Newman
Defendant:
David L. Morse and Livingston, County of
Newman v. Hamburg, Township of et al
as 2:2012cv10258
Plaintiff:
Daniel Newman
Defendant:
Hamburg, Township of, Eric Calhoun and Patrick Debotttis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinette et al v. Schirard et al
as 1:2010cv02172
Plaintiff:
Bonner Robinette and Shirley Robinette
Defendant:
Sydney (I) Schirard, Sydney Schirard, Bobbie (I) Fender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
