Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Douglas Charles Okun v. County of San Luis Obispo, et al
as 2:2020cv00178
Defendant:
County of San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo Probation Office, Arnold Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Charles Okun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HURSTON v. INDIANA GAMING COMPANY LLC
as 1:2019cv04890
Defendant:
INDIANA GAMING COMPANY LLC, DOES I THROUGH X INCLUSIVE, ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I THROUGH X, INCLUSIVE and others
Plaintiff:
MIRACLE HURSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01247
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05400
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alvaro Casillas Godinez v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2018cv02552
Defendant:
Jason Anthony Frey, City of Rancho Cucamonga, J. McInerney and others
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Casillas-Godinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv07737
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv02192
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Citimortgage Inc v. Raymond D Flint et al
as 5:2015cv01663
Plaintiff:
Citimortgage Inc
Defendant:
Raymond D Flint, Does I through X, inclusive and Anthony Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
