Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wang v. Thygesen et al
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Kailin Wang
Defendant:
Christoffer Stanford Thygesen, Allan Christoffer Thygesen, Teresa Thygesen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jon Davidson v. City of Alhambra et al
as 2:2020cv05180
Defendant:
Douglas Lee, Michael Hennes, Gerardo Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Jon Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simon v. City of New York
as 17-1281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alexina Simon
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, P.O. Lee, P.O. Evelyn and others
Seitz v. Waldron et al
as 3:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lee Seitz
Defendant:
John Waldron, John Lohff, Unalaska Borough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Li v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv01599
Defendant:
ADA P. Leigh Bishop, Sgt. Timothy Cai, Det. Dennis Chan and others
Plaintiff:
Ying Li
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Douglas Rollins, III v. Board of Trustees of The Unive, et al
as 14-14882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS LEE ROLLINS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA, THE, an educational institution and MICHAEL S. REDDY, DMD, Dean of the School of Dentristy, in his official and individual capacities
Douglas Parris v. Hillary Taft, et al
as 14-12360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS LEE PARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
HILLARY TAFT, SAM HUNTER, VAUGHN MAXWELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rollins v. Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama, The et al
as 2:2012cv02458
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lee Rollins, III
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama, The and Michael S Reddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Simon v. City of New York
as 11-5386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alexina Simon
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, P.O. Lee, P.O. Evelyn and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
