Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Metro Builders Supply, Inc. et al v. City of Lowell, Arkansas et al
as 5:2023cv05229
Plaintiff:
Metro Builders Supply, Inc. and Metro Builders Supply of Rogers, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Lowell, Arkansas, Chris Moore, Elizabeth Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 2:2023cv02109
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, Facebook, Meta LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stilley v. Trump et al
as 4:2023cv00773
Plaintiff:
Oscar Stilley
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, John Thurston, Rudolph William Louis Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Ellis v. Faulkner County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
Corey L Ellis
Defendant:
Faulkner County Jail, Tim Ryals and Does Jail Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Ellis v. United States
as 5:2022cv05104
Plaintiff:
Mack Ellis
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ellis v. United States
as 5:2022cv05103
Plaintiff:
Mack Ellis
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ellis et al v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 3:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Holly Cristen Ellis and Jeremy Edward Ellis
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Asa Hutchinson, Keith Chrestman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Ellis v. Brown et al
as 4:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Carole Ellis
Defendant:
Walker Brown and Benton, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ellis v. Borders et al
as 4:2020cv00028
Defendant:
Nikita Borders, Evans and Jim Cheeks
Plaintiff:
Corey L Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
