Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Coke v. Retirement Systems of Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Edward M Coke
Defendant:
Retirement Systems of Alabama, Director of Benefits Christopher Townes, Roy Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bandy-Freeman v. City of Tarrant, Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv01148
Plaintiff:
Veronica Bandy-Freeman
Defendant:
City of Tarrant, Alabama, Wayman A Newton and John Tommy Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Marshall et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Jean Ronado
Defendant:
Steven Troy Marshall, Christopher John England, Patricia Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freeman v. Alabama Department of Revenue (MAG+)
as 2:2021cv00536
Plaintiff:
Persephanie Chanelle Freeman
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Revenue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman-Newsome v. Wild Subs Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv00489
Plaintiff:
Amyah Freeman-Newsome
Defendant:
Wild Subs Incorporated, Karen Rodiguez and Karen Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311
Harmon v. Alabama, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00947
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Calhoun County, Cleburne County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
