Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Howard v. Tennessee Department of Mental Health
as 1:2026cv01100
Plaintiff:
William Scott Howard, Sr
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Mental Health doing business as Full Service Partnership
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Full Service Partnership et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Defendant:
Mental Health Agencies, Organization Tennessee/ Unnamed Defendants 1-100 and Full Service Partnership
Plaintiff:
William Scott Howard, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01906
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Howard v. Jackson Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv01266
Plaintiff:
William Scott Howard
Defendant:
Jackson Police Department, FSP Agencies, Full Service Partnership Agencies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv07262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jeff Cox v. Full Service Auto Parts, Inc.
as 17-50456
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFF W. COX
Defendant - Appellee:
FULL SERVICE AUTO PARTS, INCORPORATED
Cox v. Full Service Auto Parts, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00678
Plaintiff:
Jeff W Cox
Defendant:
Full Service Auto Parts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Employment Discrimination on Basis of Disability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
