Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Mack v. Swartz et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mack
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Swartz, Ayinde Immanuel Ashford, Kerry P Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flores v. Camacho Jr. et al
as 1:2023cv01127
Plaintiff:
Maria Flores and Domingo Flores
Defendant:
Camacho Manuel, Jr, Anthony Cannon, City of Giddings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J.V. v. Von Ehlinger, et al.
as 1:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
J.V. a.k.a. Jane Doe
Defendant:
Aaron von Ehlinger and Priscilla Giddings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIDDINGS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.
as 2:2021cv04206
Plaintiff:
JACOB GIDDINGS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICER TYREE BENNETT and OFFICER TYREE BURNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Texas Youth Commission et al
as 4:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Giddings State School, Texas Youth Commission, Lee County, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Eunice Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Palken v. Olds, et al.
as 3:2020cv00129
Defendant:
Doug Giddings, John Does, Scott G. Olds and others
Plaintiff:
Melina Palken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Thompson et al
as 3:2019cv02126
Plaintiff:
John Barton Clark and John Barto Clark
Defendant:
City of Burleson, Texas, Robert Clint Thompson, Louis Michael Giddings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ross et al v. City of Cottonwood et al
as 3:2018cv00498
Defendant:
Jack a/k/a Scott Paulsen, Idaho County Sheriff's Department, Terry Cochran and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis "Joe" Ross, Polly Mozingo and Dennis Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
