Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Farrell v. Harrell et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael Farrell
Defendant:
Mark Harrell, Larry Nixon and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Phillips v. City of Satsuma et al
as 1:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Phillips
Defendant:
City of Satsuma, Heather Davis, Clint Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard v. Max Credit Union et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Chauncy Richard
Defendant:
Max Credit Union, Martin Head, Chambless Math and Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Archibald et al v. City of Creola et al
as 1:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Mandy C. Archibald, Charie D. McSwain and Randy W. McSwain
Defendant:
City of Creola, Mark Howell, Frank Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00868
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Tipton v. Houston County Board of Education et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
as 1:2017cv00588
Plaintiff:
Shannon Tipton
Defendant:
Houston County Board of Education , David Sewell , Tim Pitchford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00394
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Fowler v. Meeks et al
as 2:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
Timothy Shane Fowler
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks , Covington County Drug Task Force, Covington County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
