Civil Rights Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01685
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv02690
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv03184
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 re Job Discrimination (Religion)
Smith v. Hill
as 0:2022cv02927
Plaintiff: Eric Smith
Defendant: James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce v. Itasca County et al
as 0:2022cv00441
Plaintiff: Debra Faye Pierce
Defendant: Itasca County, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Fairview Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill
as 0:2022cv00392
Plaintiff: Benjamin Joseph Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hill v. Rudenick et al.
as 0:2022cv00393
Plaintiff: Benjamin Joseph Hill
Defendant: Thomas Keith Rudenick, John Does, Ramsey, County of, the and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Audette v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2020cv02495
Defendant: Matthew Clark, Daryl Hill, F.B.I. and others
Plaintiff: Dr. Steven Audette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sears v. Barrows et al
as 0:2020cv01083
Defendant: Gene Hill, Rodrick Barrows and City of Isanti, the
Plaintiff: Michael Sears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv02329
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?