Cases 1 - 10 of 48
GLENN v. CLAYTON et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
GURLEY E. GLENN
Defendant:
GERALD CLAYTON, DOUGLAS R HARRISON, EDWARD HOUGH WILLAFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Simon et al
as 3:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Katherine Hord Simon, Tammy H. Hightower, Donald J. Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Wallenstein et al
as 3:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Marc Hubbard
Defendant:
Marc A. Wallenstein, William A. Harrison, Leslie E. Osbourne, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamrick et al v. Rutherford County et al
as 1:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Michelle Hamrick and Hayley Harrison
Defendant:
Rutherford County, John K Carroll, Kimber Dover-Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kalk v. Miller et al
as 1:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert Harrison Kalk
Defendant:
Quinten Miller, Jeffrey Littrell and Buncombe County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00136
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Harrington-Wall v. City of Monroe, NC, et al
as 3:2019cv00366
Defendant:
City of Monroe, NC and Martel Harrison
Plaintiff:
Mauricia Harrington-Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv
Liverman, et al v. Liverman et al
as 2:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Harrison Liverman and Marcus Forehand
Defendant:
Darryl Liverman , NC State Bureau of Investigation, AL SUMMERLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
