Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Norris et al v. City of Asheville et al
as 1:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Sarah Boddy Norris, Abigail Temoshchuk-Reynolds, Amy Hamilton and others
Defendant:
City of Asheville, Debra Campbell, D. Tyrell McGirt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TEASLEY v. HOKE et al
as 1:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
KENYA TEASLEY
Defendant:
DAVID HOKE, AUDREY TURNLEY and JUDGE ORLANDO HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haley v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Edward C Haley
Defendant:
Garry L. McFadden, Wellpath, LLC, Mecklenburg County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALLEN v. COOPER
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
ROY COOPER, TROOPER D.R. HUDSON, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bishop v. Funderburk et al
as 3:2021cv00679
Plaintiff:
Dan Bishop
Defendant:
Amy L Funderburk, Paul Newby, Robin Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TEASLEY v. HUDSON
as 1:2021cv00265
Defendant:
JUDGE ORLANDO HUDSON
Plaintiff:
KENYA TEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
ALLEN, SR v. HUDSON
as 1:2020cv00693
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR
Defendant:
ORLANDO F. HUDSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker v. Department of Social Services et al
as 3:2019cv00672
Defendant:
Lisa Hudson, Department of Social Services, Shelby Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Lekayle M. Booker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
NORTH CAROLINA COALITION FOR ISRAEL et al v. CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2019cv00309
Defendant:
STEVE SCHEWEL, DURHAM CITY COUNCIL, ANDREA M. HUDSON and others
Plaintiff:
PERRI SHALOM-LIBERTY, NORTH CAROLINA COALITION FOR ISRAEL, RABBI JEROME FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
