Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Johnson v. J P Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 5:2021cv04207
Plaintiff:
Kareem Johnson
Defendant:
Deon Morris, L L P, J P Morgan Chase Bank and Deon Morris L L P
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132
GONZALEZ v. J P MORGAN CHASE BANK NA et al
as 4:2019cv00128
Defendant:
JENNIFER R DIXON, J P MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, RONALD D EDWARDS, JR and others
Plaintiff:
ADA A GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01632
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Curley et al v. Bank One
as 6:2014cv02633
Plaintiff:
Sandra Curley and Mark Curley
Defendant:
J P Morgan Chase Bank N A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hernandez v. JP Morgan Chase & Company et al
as 2:2013cv03125
Plaintiff:
Francisco Hernandez
Defendant:
J P Morgan Chase & Co, J P Morgan Chase Bank, NA, Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. J P Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv02100
Plaintiff:
Linda Walker
Defendant:
J P Morgan Chase Bank N.A., United Auto Delivery & Recovery Inc. and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Iberia Texaco Food Mart L L C et al v. Ackal et al
as 6:2012cv01450
Plaintiff:
Iberia Texaco Food Mart L L C and Sakhawat Hossain
Defendant:
Louis M Ackal, J P Morgan Chase Bank N A, Jason Comeaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacob et al v. Ackal
as 6:2012cv01338
Plaintiff:
Emmette Jacob , Cupids Closet of New Iberia L L C and Emmette Enterprises L L C
Defendant:
Louis M Ackal , J P Morgan Chase Bank N A, Jason Comeaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
