Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Mark Stuart, et al v. City of Scottsdale, et al
as 22-16300
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK STUART and VIRGINIA G. STUART
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a Municipal Corporation and a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, WJ LANE, Husband, AKA Jim Lane, JOANN LANE, wife and others
Mark Stuart, et al v. City of Scottsdale, et al
as 22-15498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK STUART and VIRGINIA G. STUART
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a Municipal Corporation and a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, WJ LANE, Husband, AKA Jim Lane, JOANN LANE, wife and others
Save Our Preserve Poli Action v. City of Scottsdale, et al
as 18-16180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAVE OUR PRESERVE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE OF SCOTTSDALE, on behalf of itself and its members and volunteers
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, WJ LANE, named as Mayor W.M. "Jim" Lane, JOANNE LANE and others
Save Our Preserve Political Action Committee of Scottsdale v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2018cv01047
Plaintiff:
Save Our Preserve Political Action Committee of Scottsdale
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of , WJ Lane, Joanne Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whiteside v. Ashworth et al
as 2:2012cv01263
Plaintiff:
Jamel Whiteside
Defendant:
Toni Ashworth, Sgt Pischke, Joanne Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schwartz et al v. Bowles et al
as 4:2007cv00410
Plaintiff:
Charles N Schwartz, Jr, Charles N Schwartz, Jr, Rosalie Schwartz and others
Intervenor:
Jeffrey A Lehmann
Defendant:
Harry L Bowles, Ray E Dittmar, Phrogge Simons and others
Counter Claimant:
Harry L Bowles
Counter Defendant:
Harry L Bowles
Third Party Defendant:
Thompson & Knight , L.L.P., Joe H. Reynolds, Andrew Kurth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
