Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ronald Van Hook v. State of Idaho, et al
as 23-35457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD VAN HOOK
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, BEAVER, Magistrate Judge; Judge, MCKEE, District Court Judge;Judge and others
Van Hook v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Ronald Van Hook
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Judge Beaver, Judge McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van Hook v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2021cv00199
Defendant:
ALPS- Property and Casualty Insurance Company, State of Idaho, Judges of the Idaho Third judicial District Collectively and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Van Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Hook et al v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2019cv00170
Defendant:
John Doe(s) 1-100, Mary Grant, Idaho Bar Association and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Van Hook, Gabriel Van Hook and Nathan Van Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRISS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2016cv00140
Plaintiff:
TONIJAH E. CRISS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, SOMERSET COUNTY, BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS SOMERSET COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BLAND v. THE COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2015cv04144
Plaintiff:
JEREMY DALE BLAND
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, THE CAMDEN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and others
Cross_claimant:
LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Cross_defendant:
ABC CORP(S) 1-100, CHARLES H. BILLINGHAM, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. NEW JERSEY TRAINING SCHOOL FOR BOYS et al
as 3:2013cv00295
Plaintiff:
JIHAD GILBERT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRAINING SCHOOL FOR BOYS and JOHN DOE(s) [1-100]
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUDLEY v. BOROUGH OF UPLAND et al
as 2:2012cv05651
Plaintiff:
SHRONDA DUDLEY
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF UPLAND , JOHN DOE(S) (1-100), COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
