Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Cannariato v. Schauer et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
William Cannariato
Defendant:
Kyle Schauer, Christopher Buhay, Mount Carmel Borough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tigue v. Pennsylvania State Police et al
as 3:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Roy W. Tigue
Defendant:
Pennsylvania State Police, PSP Corporal Sean Smith, PSP Trooper Travis Graziano and others
Debtor:
PSP Trooper George Weitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOYD v. DOE
as 2:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
JARRETT WILLIAM BOYD
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOES 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURNS v. SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al
as 2:2022cv02941
Plaintiff:
QUINTON BURNS
Defendant:
SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC. doing business as SESAME PLACE PHILADELPHIA, SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT LLC doing business as SESAME PLACE PHILADELPHIA and JOHN DOES 1, 2, 3, AND 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Murph v. Long, et al.
as 5:2021cv00053
Defendant:
Officer Long and JOHN DOES #1-2
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M. MURPH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00174
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLINGER v. MAYO et al
as 1:2019cv00368
Defendant:
MONITORS JOHN DOE 1, 2, & 3 and MONITOR MAYO
Plaintiff:
RYAN KLINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. NEWELL et al
as 1:2018cv00377
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT BILL HARMON, JOHN DOES 1-2 and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JEFFERY NEWELL
Plaintiff:
LORI BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv04815
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LIEUTENANT BILL, POLICE OFFICER JOSEPH T. CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv00104
Plaintiff:
JULIO DIAZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BRUCE HERDMAN, JOHN DOES 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
