Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Isijola v. Grasso et al
as 4:2023cv40156
Plaintiff:
Femi Isijola and Pro se litigant Femi Jay Isijola
Defendant:
Bejamin Grasso, Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security, Unnamed Trooper (4576) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv30090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jaiswal v. Chaturvedi et al
as 1:2023cv11388
Plaintiff:
Arvind Kumar Jay Jaiswal
Defendant:
Rahul Chaturvedi and Moolex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amarat et al v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2023cv40065
Plaintiff:
javier Amarat, Veronica Euga, Christopher Euga and others
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Edward M. Augustus, Jr., Steven W. Sargent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hylton v. Ralph
as 4:2020cv40019
Defendant:
Thomas Ralph
Plaintiff:
Jai Hylton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarasuik et al v. Greenville Real Estate Group, Inc et al
as 1:2019cv11927
Defendant:
Jay Zaheer, Greenville Real Estate Group, Inc and Daniel R Ryan, Sr
Plaintiff:
Joan Bernard and Ryan Tarasuik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Liviz Sr. v. Baker et al
as 1:2019cv10304
Defendant:
Governor Charlie Baker, Governor Phil Bryant, Governor Henry McMaster and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist Ilya Liviz Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
