Cases 1 - 8 of 8
FREEMAN v. FADD et al
as 1:2016cv02134
Plaintiff:
MARK ELLIOTT FREEMAN
Defendant:
FADD, JOHN HESS, HANK WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richardson v. City of Federal Heights et al
as 1:2015cv01837
Defendant:
Curtis (I) Arganbright, City of Federal Heights, John Hess and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hess v. Hanneman et al
as 3:2014cv02271
Plaintiff:
John Hess
Defendant:
Dave Hanneman, Jim Sandoval, Irene Mosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Margaret Fostiak v. Douglas Floski, et al
as 13-3322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARET FOSTIAK
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS FLOSKI, Members of the Board of Education, each in his individual capacity, KATHI GEHRKE, Members of the Board of Education, each in his individual capacity, MATTHEW MEYERS, Members of the Board of Education, each in his individual capacity and others
Fostiak v. Board of Education of CUSD 226 et al
as 3:2013cv50078
Plaintiff:
Margaret Fostiak
Defendant:
School Directors Of District 226, County Of Ogle, State Of Illinois , Douglas Floski , Kathi Gehrke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fostiak v. Byron Community Unit School District 226 et al
as 3:2011cv50231
Plaintiff:
Margaret Fostiak
Defendant:
Byron Community Unit School District 226 , The Board Of Education Of CUSD #226 , Douglas Floski and others
Steven Hatley et al v. Walter Tuffy et al
as 11-1019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN HATLEY, MOHAMED ALI, II, BRIAN SHAFFER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WALTER TUFFY, JOSEPH SMITH, DEBBIE OWENS and others
Hatley et al v. Tuffy et al
as 1:2009cv00711
Plaintiff:
Steven Hatley, Mohamed Ali, II, Brian Shaffer and others
Defendant:
Walter Tuffy, Joseph Smith, Debbie Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
