Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Williams v. Richardson et al
as 1:2023cv04071
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
Emily K. Richardson and Laura Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2021cv01254
Plaintiff:
Rabbi K Richardson, Rabbi K.A. Israel, Rabbi Kohen Cohen Cohain Gadol and others
Defendant:
United States District Court and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richardson v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2021cv01256
Plaintiff:
Rabbi K Richardson, Rabbi K.A. Israel, Rabbi Kohen Cohen Cohain Gadol and others
Defendant:
United States District Court, Ku Klux Klan and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richardson v. Naziism in America et al
as 3:2021cv01255
Plaintiff:
Rabbi K Richardson, Rabbi K.A. Israel and Rabbi Kohen Cohen Cohain Gadol
Defendant:
Naziism in America, United States District Court and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jimenez v. Richardson et al
as 1:2018cv00780
Plaintiff:
Salvador M. Jimenez
Defendant:
Paul K. Richardson, Jay Linden, Allison Zuela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdul Khan, et al v. Newell Normand, Sheriff, et al
as 11-30112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL S. KHAN and HAJERA T. KHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
NEWELL NORMAND, as successor to Harry Lee, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Jefferson Parish, TIM STIERWALD, Deputy, JOHN O'BRIEN, Deputy and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-56089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv07491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Khan et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2007cv07272
Plaintiff:
Abdul S. Khan, Abdul S. Khan, Hajera T. Khan and others
Defendant:
Harry Lee, Tim Stierwald, John O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
