Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Johnson v. County of Mendocino et al
as 1:2024cv07250
Defendant:
Deputy Jesus Lopez-Gonzales, Sheriff Matthew Kendall and Deputy Michael Jensen
Plaintiff:
Kelli Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson
as 1:2024cv07245
Plaintiff:
Kelli Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Mendocino County et al
as 1:2024cv07220
Defendant:
Mendocino County, Michael Jensen, Sheriff Matthew Kendall and others
Plaintiff:
Kelli Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Perreaud et al
as 6:2020cv06124
Plaintiff:
Timothy Miller
Defendant:
Molly Perreaud, Kelly Johnson and out patient men
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Archuleta v. Bettes et al
as 1:2019cv00682
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Archuleta
Defendant:
Trent Bettes, Kelly Johnson and Farmers Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Culverhouse v. The City of Fort Pierce et al
as 2:2018cv14227
Plaintiff:
John B. Culverhouse, Sr.
Defendant:
The City of Fort Pierce, Nicholas Mimms, Shaun Coss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charleston Singletary v. Kim Ogg, et al
as 18-20360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLESTON SINGLETARY
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM OGG, District Attorney, ASHLEY SHERIDAN, District Attorney (D.A.) (Court 178th), JUDGE KELLI JOHNSON, (Court 178th) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
