Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Jay Nygard v. City of Orono, et al
as 24-1232
Plaintiff:
Jay Nygard
Defendant:
City of Orono, A Minnesota Municipality, Dennis Sabourin Walsh, Orono Mayor, in his individual and official capacities, Dennis Sabourin Walsh, Orono Resident and others
Airola v. Dutcher et al
as 1:2023cv01453
Plaintiff:
Darwin Airola
Defendant:
Judge Guy Dutcher, Stephanie Knutson, Wendy Axt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamar Robinson, et al v. Grace Knutson
as 23-2979
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR ROBINSON and MARTELL D. ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
GRACE E. KNUTSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Robinson et al v Knutson
as 2:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
Lamar Robinson and Martell Rogers
Defendant:
Grace E Knutson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nygard v. Orono, City of et al
as 0:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Jay Thomas Nygard
Defendant:
Orono, City of, Dennis Sabourin Walsh, Correy Farniok and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Bullitt County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2022cv00451
Plaintiff:
Karen Renee Lawrence
Defendant:
Bullitt County, Kentucky, Paul Watkins, Brista Lea Knutson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clervrain et al v. Lankford et al
as 5:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Biglauwick Plaisimond, Manetirony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
James Lankford, Jim Inhofe, Stephanie Bice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bratz v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Randall S Bratz
Defendant:
Andrew Smith, Mary Kerrigan Mares, Lt Romas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
