Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Dean v. Campbell et al
as 5:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
David Dean
Defendant:
Darren Campbell, Darren Williams, John Fleming Kissinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McLaughlin et al v. Onslow County Board of Elections et al
as 7:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
joseph robert mclaughlin, lori ready-digiovanni and juan carlos beltran
Defendant:
onslow county board of elections, jason dedmond, michael a morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Layden v. Stanley et al
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Timothy Layden
Defendant:
Thomas F Stanley, Logan S Copas, Ronnie T Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Washington et al v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2021cv00194
Plaintiff:
Connell Wilson, Mario King, Shakari Ore and others
Defendant:
Julien Rattelade, Jason Gwinn, David Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fields v. Gaston County
as 3:2020cv00055
Plaintiff:
Boo Loo Fields, Tony The Tiger Fields, Anubie Anubus Fields and others
Defendant:
Gaston County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaston County et al v. Fields
as 3:2019cv00715
Defendant:
Sillygirl Sally Fields, Buh Buh Logan Fields, Buddy Logan Fields and others
Plaintiff:
USA and Gaston County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Logan v. Dillard's Department Store of Winston Salem
as 5:2019cv00439
Plaintiff:
Sharon D. Logan
Defendant:
Dillard's Department Store of Winston Salem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Logan v. Dillard's Department Store of Winston Salem
as 5:2019cv00169
Plaintiff:
Sharon D. Logan
Defendant:
Dillard's Department Store of Winston Salem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
